Prokopp - Bishopsgate Goodsyard

Prokopp v. London Underground Ltd (1) LB Hackney (2) LB Tower Hamlets (3)

Case No: CO/1646/2002

Neutral Citation Number: [2003] EWHC 960 Admin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

QUEENS BENCH DIVISION

ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand,

London, WC2A 2LL

Friday 2 May 2003

Before :

The Hon MR Justice COLLINS

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between : R(Prokopp)

- and - R(Prokopp)

- and -

London Underground Limited

London Borough of Hackney

London Borough of Tower Hamlets

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Prokopp v. London Underground Ltd (1) LB Hackney (2) LB Tower Hamlets (3)

MR JUSTICE COLLINS: You have all, I think, seen a copy of the judgment. There is one error which I spotted in paragraph 34 in the fourth last line, the sentence beginning "It is in those circumstances difficult to see". It should be "how it could conceivably be said", rather than "would". I am grateful to you all for spotting some other typing errors. That is the judgment. So, I had better see what relief there should be.

MR CLAYTON: My Lord, I hope your Lordship has seen a document which is called "Third Draft Order".

Prokopp v. London Underground Limited and others

Case No: C1/ 2003/1058/A,

C1/2003/1058,

C1/2003/1060,

C1/2003/1061 & 1064

Neutral Citation No: [2003] EWCA Civ 961

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)

ON APPEAL FROM QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION

COLLINS J

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand,

London, WC2A 2LL

Monday 7th July 2003

Before :

LORD JUSTICE KENNEDY

LORD JUSTICE SCHIEMANN

and

LORD JUSTICE BUXTON

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

Subscribe to RSS - Prokopp - Bishopsgate Goodsyard